[Rover]

[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1360324624' post='21849']

I agree. It looks decidedly "russian"...

[/quote]

Hey!.. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/angry.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':angry:' /> <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':blink:' /> <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />

Looks wise, the Voigtlander looks way better.

Bet the image quality is also a notch above. But if I'd been in a market for a µ4/3 lens in the range, I would've waited for the Panasonic. It looks more balanced in every sense of the word. Bet these ultra fast manual lenses aren't that good wide open anyways and if I have to stop down, what's the point? (Besides, DOF would be practically non-existent, and that's not something I appreciate for my practical work).



However, I wager that testing them is a fun process... <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cool.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='B)' />