Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fuji - I'm in love
#1
Perfect - a X-E1 without this senseless optical VF and a 14mm prime. I'm a happy camper! [Image: biggrin.gif]



[url="http://www.fujifilm.com/news/n120906.html"]http://www.fujifilm.com/news/n120906.html[/url]

[url="http://www.fujifilm.com/news/n120906_02.html"]http://www.fujifilm.com/news/n120906_02.html[/url]
#2
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1346928196' post='19953']

Perfect - a X-E1 without this senseless optical VF and a 14mm prime. I'm a happy camper! [Image: biggrin.gif]



[url="http://www.fujifilm.com/news/n120906.html"]http://www.fujifilm....ws/n120906.html[/url]

[url="http://www.fujifilm.com/news/n120906_02.html"]http://www.fujifilm....n120906_02.html[/url]

[/quote]



Oh, BTW, in case somebody is interested - I'm selling the X-Pro1 & XF 18mm f/2 from our test stock.

Market price -25% (=1630EUR) as a package or -20% per item (=1200EUR for the X-Pro1, 440EUR for the 18mm f/2).
#3
The 14mm is not a pancake, and Fuji claims sharpness from corner to corner. If they also have distortion under control, this should be a very nice lens.
#4
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1346928559' post='19955']

The 14mm is not a pancake, and Fuji claims sharpness from corner to corner. If they also have distortion under control, this should be a very nice lens.

[/quote]



Well, they apply distortion auto-correction (see the 18mm f/2 review) under the hood.

Given the size can _comparatively_ low speed of the 14mm they should not let loose altogether.

900$ is also not cheap.
#5
They should have made a 16-50 standard zoom instead of 18-55.
#6
Do you think the evf and auto focus will be better on the e-1 ? When I played with an xpro-1 in a shop the evf refresh rate (indoors) was quite annoying. I actually have high hope for the evf on the e-1 since folks are claiming it is the same one in the nex-6...
#7
[quote name='Sammy' timestamp='1346934413' post='19957']

They should have made a 16-50 standard zoom instead of 18-55.

[/quote]



Yes, always a bit late on spotting the trends, that is the 24mm trend...

Canon 15-85, Zeiss 16-80, Olympus 12-60 & 12-50, Panasonic 12-35, Canon 24-105, Nikon 24-120, Canon/nikon/tamron/sigma 24-70 & so on...



Nice aperture, though.
#8
Well, they must've deduced that most people will be getting an UWA lens anyways. Hardly anybody I know is content with having a 24mm equivalent. Also having the kit zoom start at 16mm would've hurt the sales of the 14mm. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Smile' />
#9
[quote name='Rover' timestamp='1346953156' post='19965']

Well, they must've deduced that most people will be getting an UWA lens anyways. Hardly anybody I know is content with having a 24mm equivalent. Also having the kit zoom start at 16mm would've hurt the sales of the 14mm. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Smile' />

[/quote]



Whatever, I do prefer kit zooms providing a 24mm equivalent.
#10
same here, I do appreciate those 4mm extra <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Smile' />

Every extra mm is a chance not to have to switch lenses. Overlap is good.
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)