06-27-2012, 04:47 AM
[quote name='jmfitamant' timestamp='1340742899' post='19161']
As lanscapes photographer, I (logically) begun to chose my lenses, following the level of quality I wanted to reach. I've got a 2/24mm ZA, a 1,4/85mm ZA and plan to get a 8-16mm Sigma. Since there is a lot of uncertainty about the 24MP quality, does it worth better to get a A57 than an A77 ? The 16MP is known as a very good one.
Even I lose AF, these lenses with a Novoflex adapter (with aperture ring) on a Fuji X-Pro 1 seems to be an original way to get very good quality too.
What do you think about that ?
Regards.
JMi
[/quote]
I am personally underwhelmed by the Fuji X family. As to me they reveal that whilst Fuji has some good ideas about cameras that are slightly different, as a company they lack the technology to make the ideas really work.
I would suggest that you need to borrow or hire both the A77 and the Fuji for a week and really, really work them hard. Then go away and think about it and only then make a decision.
As lanscapes photographer, I (logically) begun to chose my lenses, following the level of quality I wanted to reach. I've got a 2/24mm ZA, a 1,4/85mm ZA and plan to get a 8-16mm Sigma. Since there is a lot of uncertainty about the 24MP quality, does it worth better to get a A57 than an A77 ? The 16MP is known as a very good one.
Even I lose AF, these lenses with a Novoflex adapter (with aperture ring) on a Fuji X-Pro 1 seems to be an original way to get very good quality too.
What do you think about that ?
Regards.
JMi
[/quote]
I am personally underwhelmed by the Fuji X family. As to me they reveal that whilst Fuji has some good ideas about cameras that are slightly different, as a company they lack the technology to make the ideas really work.
I would suggest that you need to borrow or hire both the A77 and the Fuji for a week and really, really work them hard. Then go away and think about it and only then make a decision.