05-21-2012, 12:27 PM
Just curious, why don't you consider the 12-60 f/2.8-4 if you're looking at FT lenses? Price?
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1337602193' post='18388']
Well compare it to other options in 4/3 m4/3; and where does it fit ?
First from panasonic:
14-45 f3.5-5.6 $300
12-35 f2.8 $1500
olympus:
14-42 f3.5-5.6 $200
12-50 f3.5-6.3 $500
14-54 f2.8-3.5 $600 (4/3 lens but I believe it is worth comparing)
-
Hum. Anyone know how the 14-54 performs relative to the panasonic. $600 seems more likeable than $1600...
The 12/2 is $700; the 25f1.4 $500 and the 45f1.8 is $400; so the collection of primes is nearly the same as the 12-35; though there is the hassle of changing lenses.
[/quote]
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1337602193' post='18388']
Well compare it to other options in 4/3 m4/3; and where does it fit ?
First from panasonic:
14-45 f3.5-5.6 $300
12-35 f2.8 $1500
olympus:
14-42 f3.5-5.6 $200
12-50 f3.5-6.3 $500
14-54 f2.8-3.5 $600 (4/3 lens but I believe it is worth comparing)
-
Hum. Anyone know how the 14-54 performs relative to the panasonic. $600 seems more likeable than $1600...
The 12/2 is $700; the 25f1.4 $500 and the 45f1.8 is $400; so the collection of primes is nearly the same as the 12-35; though there is the hassle of changing lenses.
[/quote]