Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tokina 100-300/4.0 AT-X is too heavy. Weighing alternatives.
#5
[quote name='Sammy' timestamp='1333653149' post='17335']

The Tamron AF 70-300mm f/4.0-5.6 Di LD is truly a great bargain but be prepared to see sometimes massive CA at the long end.[/quote]



I'm shooting RAW, so this should be fine.



[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1333657446' post='17336']

hmm, never have seen good results from the LD. Its CA is bad (and not all RAW converters correct CA well), and it has no great contrast either. I would go for the USD one. Does it have that USD on A-mount, at least?[/quote]



Don't confuse the old LD with the newer Di LD version. The latter is not a great lens, but stopped down to f/8.0 it's not that different than the SP version (or at least that's what the tests lead me to believe).



The USD motor of the SP is faster than the screw-driven Di LD, but I'm not convinced it's worth paying so much more for. I wish it had a focus limiter. That would have made the decision easier.



[quote name='Rover' timestamp='1333688238' post='17340']

It does: http://kurtmunger.com/tamron_70_300mm_f_4_5_6id290.html[/quote]



Thanks for the link. Nice review.
  


Messages In This Thread
Tokina 100-300/4.0 AT-X is too heavy. Weighing alternatives. - by boren - 04-07-2012, 11:40 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)