[url="http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/x/fujifilm_x_pro1/sample_images/"]http://www.fujifilm.com/products/digital_cameras/x/fujifilm_x_pro1/sample_images/[/url]
01-09-2012, 10:52 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-09-2012, 10:55 PM by youpii.)
No harsh bokeh test <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='

' />
And the diamond bee is not sharp
http://flickr.com/ephankim
I hear the ones saying the samples are not quite satisfactory... I hope this spectacular concept (new color filter -no AA filter-, compact IL system, future M lens compatibility, hybrid VF) will not be ruined by some average lenses...
Thanks for the link, Klauss
Same sentiments as previous posters... not particularly blown away. I was hoping to see pixal sharpness rivaling that of Sigma SD1/9/10/14... didn't happen.
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1326181252' post='14626']
I hear the ones saying the samples are not quite satisfactory... I hope this spectacular concept (new color filter -no AA filter-, compact IL system, future M lens compatibility, hybrid VF) will not be ruined by some average lenses...
[/quote]
Frankly this is mostly a matter of post processing. These images are so clean that I'd guess that no sharpening at all was applied. And they look like straight JPEGs to me.
We'll see ...
As I think I mentioned in another thread, this is with their new colour filter arrangement so it'll be interesting to see how that works out in more situations. And if it gives headaches to RAW software developers to get the most out of it. I'm kinda disappointed it has even less chroma coverage than bayer.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.