Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fuji X-Pro1 ...
#1
https://wellsfargoadvisors.mworld.com/m/...=587442481



So a 16mp APS-C sensor and 3 primes to boot:

[size="2"]18mm (27mm equivalent) f/2.0

35mm (53mm equivalent) f/1.4

60mm (90mm equivalent) f/2.4[/size]



Welcome back, Fuji. It was about time. ;-)

Expect, of course, full system coverage here at PZ ASAP.
#2
It will be interesting so see how they moved the hybrid view finder from a single focal length to variable focal lengths.



-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

#3
These three primes sound like an ideal set-up, something what mFT / NEX struggled to provide <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dry.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='<_<' />
#4
[quote name='Lomskij' timestamp='1325756090' post='14312']

These three primes sound like an ideal set-up, something what mFT / NEX struggled to provide <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dry.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='<_<' />

[/quote]



Things can be very simple indeed.

However ... no zoom at all ?
#5
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1325758346' post='14314']

However ... no zoom at all ?

[/quote]



If they managed to adopt the hybrid viewfinder to different focal lengths, they may be forced to stick to those selected focal lengths (just like the M)... or give up the "hybrid" part for zooms.



-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com

#6
[quote name='Lomskij' timestamp='1325756090' post='14312']

These three primes sound like an ideal set-up, something what mFT / NEX struggled to provide <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dry.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='<_<' />[/quote]



There is an abundance of native m43 primes/pancakes between 12-45mm.
#7
[quote name='Sammy' timestamp='1325759425' post='14316']

There is an abundance of native m43 primes/pancakes between 12-45mm.

[/quote]



But it wasn't always so :-)



Thinking in DOF & FOV "equivalence", m43 vs APS-C , the 50mm (admittedly, by considering the rather extreme VL 25mm f/0.95) & 80-90mm would be roughly equivalent while the fuji 24-28mm isn't quite matched by mft but 24mm is still rather unique at the moment in the ILC world.

Saying that the fuji, "DOF" speaking, might not be that interesting over mft. But I'm sure it will be a real treat on many other accounts.



Just my 2 cents,



S.
#8
Why 3 links to the same scammers?



Please be careful.



Do note that these people have absolutely no link with the real Wells Fargo bank. They seem to be quite capable of attracting people with some (made up) knowledge about cameras and putting together some message about an alleged (rumoured) camera, however.



Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....
#9
[quote name='Sammy' timestamp='1325759425' post='14316']

There is an abundance of native m43 primes/pancakes between 12-45mm.

[/quote]

Well, yes - now. By "struggled" I refer to the fact that for entire two years since the release of first mFT cameras the only fast prime was 20/1.7 pancake.
#10
[quote name='wim' timestamp='1325762021' post='14321']

Why 3 links to the same scammers?



Please be careful.



Do note that these people have absolutely no link with the real Wells Fargo bank. They seem to be quite capable of attracting people with some (made up) knowledge about cameras and putting together some message about an alleged (rumoured) camera, however.



Kind regards, Wim

[/quote]



http://www.whois.net/whois/mworld.com
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)