05-31-2017, 07:10 AM
Well they can also sell a 35/1.8 to other APS-C and m43 systems and still have a compact lens that makes sense for those systems. A 35/1.4 for FF would be unnecessarily large and expensive for APS-C/m43 and would make no economic sense. Sigma doesn't really make lenses for only one mount - they typically achieve low cost with large volumes over many systems. Thats why a 35/1.4 doesnt make that much sense, but i could be wrong.
Also despite all the internet mania about copy variation, my copy of the Sony Zeiss 35mm/1.4 is very good (bought from overseas with no exchanges) - instant silent AF, sharp, smooth bokeh, nice build. If you wait for sales it can also be had for ~$1500 AUD so Im not sure how a Sigma would offer much of a benefit over this option
Also despite all the internet mania about copy variation, my copy of the Sony Zeiss 35mm/1.4 is very good (bought from overseas with no exchanges) - instant silent AF, sharp, smooth bokeh, nice build. If you wait for sales it can also be had for ~$1500 AUD so Im not sure how a Sigma would offer much of a benefit over this option
Quote:Why should Sigma go for slower glass than the already existing 35/1.4 Art? Mind you, "being compact" is not the biggest strength of Sigma's lensesmore "delivering outstanding performance".