10-24-2011, 09:12 AM
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1319447167' post='12451']
That's probably a valid conclusion from the review, to which you won't come without the review, right? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
So, do you want me to no longer publish reviews of lenses which fall short of expectations or to which better alternatives are around?
-- Markus
[/quote]
no, I was just being foolish.... never mind. However, I have to say even if this lens was optically spactacular, I probably still wouldnt consider it for use on dx as in practice 90% of my shots would end up being out of focus unless I used a tripod with Liveview. For tripod usage I wouldnt of course need such a fast and heavy lens.
That's probably a valid conclusion from the review, to which you won't come without the review, right? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />So, do you want me to no longer publish reviews of lenses which fall short of expectations or to which better alternatives are around?
-- Markus
[/quote]
no, I was just being foolish.... never mind. However, I have to say even if this lens was optically spactacular, I probably still wouldnt consider it for use on dx as in practice 90% of my shots would end up being out of focus unless I used a tripod with Liveview. For tripod usage I wouldnt of course need such a fast and heavy lens.