10-25-2011, 10:21 AM
[quote name='Vieux loup' timestamp='1319537300' post='12475']
Because there is nothing wrong with using a 28mm lens for landscapes. I agree it may not always be the preferred focal length, but it can very well be used and we all do it from time to time, don't we? I would have no more problem having this lens as the only lens on an FF camera when travelling light - no more so than a 35mm!
[/quote]
Of course, I would not have much problems with 28mm on FF either... but this was on an APS-C D7000 <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />. And the resulting 42mm FF equivalent does not make landscape shooting a "natural choice" to me. Well, to me it actually would because I would shoot multiple shots and stitch them <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />.
Because there is nothing wrong with using a 28mm lens for landscapes. I agree it may not always be the preferred focal length, but it can very well be used and we all do it from time to time, don't we? I would have no more problem having this lens as the only lens on an FF camera when travelling light - no more so than a 35mm!
[/quote]
Of course, I would not have much problems with 28mm on FF either... but this was on an APS-C D7000 <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />. And the resulting 42mm FF equivalent does not make landscape shooting a "natural choice" to me. Well, to me it actually would because I would shoot multiple shots and stitch them <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />.