10-25-2011, 05:06 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1319538089' post='12476']
Of course, I would not have much problems with 28mm on FF either... but this was on an APS-C D7000 <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />. And the resulting 42mm FF equivalent does not make landscape shooting a "natural choice" to me. Well, to me it actually would because I would shoot multiple shots and stitch them <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />.
[/quote
Permit me to quote myself:
"]I think we (you) should continue to do these tests, Zeiss is high quality and there will always be takers (I think). Again, I think it makes perfect sense on a D700 for landscapes and "easy" reporting! " <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cool.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='B)' />
Of course, I would not have much problems with 28mm on FF either... but this was on an APS-C D7000 <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />. And the resulting 42mm FF equivalent does not make landscape shooting a "natural choice" to me. Well, to me it actually would because I would shoot multiple shots and stitch them <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />.[/quote
Permit me to quote myself:
"]I think we (you) should continue to do these tests, Zeiss is high quality and there will always be takers (I think). Again, I think it makes perfect sense on a D700 for landscapes and "easy" reporting! " <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cool.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='B)' />