Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
sample images - Sony E 30mm f/3.5 @ dcwatch
#1
[url="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20110913_477001.html"]http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20110913_477001.html[/url]
#2
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1315863203' post='11525']

[url="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20110913_477001.html"]http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20110913_477001.html[/url]

[/quote]

Finally a really nice lens for the Nex? Samples look very pleasant.
#3
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1315864239' post='11526']

Finally a really nice lens for the Nex? Samples look very pleasant.

[/quote]



Well, it's a macro lens. Nobody should really be able to mess up such a thing.
#4
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1315891410' post='11528']Well, it's a macro lens. Nobody should really be able to mess up such a thing.[/quote]



The samples look OKish on my screen, but it´s a lightweight (the modest max aperture...) and not too pricy lens, which fits well into the NEX system.
#5
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1315863203' post='11525']

[url="http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/review/lens_review/20110913_477001.html"]http://dc.watch.impr...913_477001.html[/url]

[/quote]



Looks very sharp... And the bokeh is very pleasent in all samples with various background distances. That's not something you see everyday...



But why that FL? 30mm on a 1.5 cropped sensor is neither wide nor long enough...



Serkan
#6
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1315896989' post='11533']

But why that FL? 30mm on a 1.5 cropped sensor is neither wide nor long enough...

[/quote]

Equivalent to 50mm macro on FF. I really wish Canon would release one...
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
#7
[quote name='Sammy' timestamp='1315894170' post='11530']

The samples look OKish on my screen, but it´s a lightweight (the modest max aperture...) and not too pricy lens, which fits well into the NEX system.

[/quote]



Okayish ? What aspect are you complaining about ? I didn't really spot a significant flaw.
#8
[quote name='popo' timestamp='1315898713' post='11535']

Equivalent to 50mm macro on FF. I really wish Canon would release one...

[/quote]



~45mm FF equivalent, actually...



Well I use my 24-85mm zoom set to 35mm with max. 1:2 ratio on FF and it is usually not wide enough... But of course it's a personal thing...



Serkan
#9
I´m not complaining, it´s just that I didn´t get goose pimples while looking <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Big Grin' />
#10
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1315901490' post='11538']

~45mm FF equivalent, actually...

[/quote]

Ok, I had my Canon hat on and was thinking in 1.6x, but regardless 10% is not really a significant difference.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)