Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DSLRs vs EVILs - by Bloomberg
#5
I think at one point they were comparing the weight of the Q to an entry level Canon DSLR.



Personally I've found while some claim mirrorless are in some middle sweet spot between compacts and SLRs, I'm finding the opposite. If I want small size, I go compact with built in lens. If I want performance, I go DSLR. Mirrorless is something in between but not quite satisfying either of my needs well at the moment.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
  


Messages In This Thread
DSLRs vs EVILs - by Bloomberg - by Klaus - 09-08-2011, 05:24 PM
DSLRs vs EVILs - by Bloomberg - by popo - 09-08-2011, 05:57 PM
DSLRs vs EVILs - by Bloomberg - by wim - 09-08-2011, 07:45 PM
DSLRs vs EVILs - by Bloomberg - by Guest - 09-09-2011, 07:04 AM
DSLRs vs EVILs - by Bloomberg - by popo - 09-09-2011, 11:18 AM
DSLRs vs EVILs - by Bloomberg - by Klaus - 09-09-2011, 11:47 AM
DSLRs vs EVILs - by Bloomberg - by popo - 09-09-2011, 12:00 PM
DSLRs vs EVILs - by Bloomberg - by Guest - 09-09-2011, 12:06 PM
DSLRs vs EVILs - by Bloomberg - by Guest - 09-09-2011, 12:21 PM
DSLRs vs EVILs - by Bloomberg - by wim - 09-09-2011, 12:30 PM
DSLRs vs EVILs - by Bloomberg - by Guest - 09-09-2011, 12:52 PM
DSLRs vs EVILs - by Bloomberg - by Guest - 09-09-2011, 01:01 PM
DSLRs vs EVILs - by Bloomberg - by Guest - 09-09-2011, 01:05 PM
DSLRs vs EVILs - by Bloomberg - by Steinar1 - 09-09-2011, 01:30 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)