08-28-2011, 12:09 PM
[quote name='Vieux loup' timestamp='1314528114' post='11100']
I think the point is that the Tamron is a better lens; The market place and the reports show it. Lots of Nikon users on the Nikon forums admit that this particular lens is better than the Niko issue and don't ask me to document it BC <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> , but all who follows must get the same impression. As a matter of fact, you yourself boost the Tamron often. This guy has asked for a good zoom lens for his Pentax. The Tamron 70-300 is one of the good alternatives and in the 70-300 family, for the moment probably the best.
[/quote]
You are confusing different lenses, old wolf. We are NOT talking about the tamron VC that you have (and you must still remember it was me who advised it to you). We are talking about a much cheaper Tamron 70-300 with a totally different optical design.
So, get that straight first.
I think the point is that the Tamron is a better lens; The market place and the reports show it. Lots of Nikon users on the Nikon forums admit that this particular lens is better than the Niko issue and don't ask me to document it BC <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> , but all who follows must get the same impression. As a matter of fact, you yourself boost the Tamron often. This guy has asked for a good zoom lens for his Pentax. The Tamron 70-300 is one of the good alternatives and in the 70-300 family, for the moment probably the best.[/quote]
You are confusing different lenses, old wolf. We are NOT talking about the tamron VC that you have (and you must still remember it was me who advised it to you). We are talking about a much cheaper Tamron 70-300 with a totally different optical design.
So, get that straight first.