08-28-2011, 10:27 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1314552843' post='11110']
I will quote from your post:
"As a matter of fact, you yourself boost the Tamron often. "
Since I only ever recommend the Tamron 70300mm VC USD, and never talk about the Tamron 70-300mm LD, only conclusion I can make is that in fact you were talking about the Tamron 70-300mm f4-5.6 USD VC.
"Lots of Nikon users on the Nikon forums admit that this particular lens is better than the Niko issue and don't ask me to document it BC <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> "
Also, yes, in Nikon forums the Tarmron 70-300mm f4-5.6 Di USD VC usually gets seen as being a bit better than the Nikon AF-S 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 VR. The Tamron 70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD does not get seen as superior. Again, only conclusion I can come to is that you indeed were NOT referring to the cheap, older LD.
So, not really my fault that I came to the conclusion you were talking about the wrong lens.
Kind regards <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> !
[/quote]
If you were not quite sure, maybe you could have asked. There is only one test of that lens on Photozone and it is on the Pentax and the crops were taken with that lens. You certainly have a lot of knowledge of things photographic, but this time you jumped to conclusions about what I think and talk about. This frankly is a waist of space, but I wish you would just stick to the facts.
I will quote from your post:
"As a matter of fact, you yourself boost the Tamron often. "
Since I only ever recommend the Tamron 70300mm VC USD, and never talk about the Tamron 70-300mm LD, only conclusion I can make is that in fact you were talking about the Tamron 70-300mm f4-5.6 USD VC.
"Lots of Nikon users on the Nikon forums admit that this particular lens is better than the Niko issue and don't ask me to document it BC <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> "Also, yes, in Nikon forums the Tarmron 70-300mm f4-5.6 Di USD VC usually gets seen as being a bit better than the Nikon AF-S 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 VR. The Tamron 70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD does not get seen as superior. Again, only conclusion I can come to is that you indeed were NOT referring to the cheap, older LD.
So, not really my fault that I came to the conclusion you were talking about the wrong lens.
Kind regards <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> ![/quote]
If you were not quite sure, maybe you could have asked. There is only one test of that lens on Photozone and it is on the Pentax and the crops were taken with that lens. You certainly have a lot of knowledge of things photographic, but this time you jumped to conclusions about what I think and talk about. This frankly is a waist of space, but I wish you would just stick to the facts.