Posts: 6,715
Threads: 236
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
22
Oh, so it is a Nikon. Then it is the 18-35mm f3.5-4.5 ED which has no resolution on the edges whatsoever, crazy high CA and very high distortion?
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1313129658' post='10663']
AF. With the exception of the tilt-shift lenses, I won't be reviewing Nikon MF lenses for another while.
-- Markus
[/quote]
Nikkor 20mm f/2.8D?
[quote name='froeschle' timestamp='1313135816' post='10676']
[url="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/1835.htm"]http://www.kenrockwe.../nikon/1835.htm[/url]
[/quote]
Making partial quotes from reviews is always a contraversial issue, but come on...:
"This 18-35mm pretty much does the same thing as the [url="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/1735.htm"]17-35mm f/2.8 AF-S[/url], in plastic with more distortion, but with slightly better sharpness, for a lot less money. "
A meticulous (!!) review for a wide angle on FX...
Serkan
Posts: 2,441
Threads: 320
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
19
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1313138184' post='10679']
"This 18-35mm pretty much does the same thing as the [url="http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/1735.htm"]17-35mm f/2.8 AF-S[/url], in plastic with more distortion, but with slightly better sharpness, for a lot less money. "
[/quote]
I can only guess that he had a poor copy of the 17-35/2.8
-- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
' />
' /> 
' />?
' />