07-27-2011, 09:34 PM
If the Nikon mirorless system really gets a sensor smaller than m4/3, I´m sure it will be more or less the same failure as the totally ridiculous Pentax Q system. Basically, it will never reach the image quality of say Sony NEX cams and those shooters, who appreciate and long for higher image quality than compact cams can offer will avoid anything smaller than m4/3. And those shooters who don´t care so much for the IQ will not have much reasons to buy this much more expensive Nikon mirorless solution and will rather take say Canon S95, Panasonic LX5 etc.
Nikon brand has build its reputation on something different than below-average products in its class... Like I´ve said, I predict Nikon mirorless with 2,7 crop is absolutely wrong step and will be failure. Esp. when Canon comes with its own mirorless system which I guess won´t feature such a crippled sensor...
You may disagree, you may argue but that´s all you can do about it. You will see I´m right here <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
Nikon brand has build its reputation on something different than below-average products in its class... Like I´ve said, I predict Nikon mirorless with 2,7 crop is absolutely wrong step and will be failure. Esp. when Canon comes with its own mirorless system which I guess won´t feature such a crippled sensor...
You may disagree, you may argue but that´s all you can do about it. You will see I´m right here <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />