05-27-2011, 05:51 PM
[quote name='Kodachrome 25' timestamp='1306517386' post='8860']
If your priority is an as fast as possible lens, than I guess I know which one you will get. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
My last hopeless attempt to talk you into a 'slow' zoom <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />:
Did you consider the Tamron 17-50/2.8 definitely non-VC?
[/quote]
Well, in the eventuality of a zoom, I was originally interested by the Canon 17-40L which is a bit above my budget and "only" F4.0
When I was younger, I was a Nikonian and really happy with my Tamron 90mm mounted on my FA. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
I just check the test on PZ (of course <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />) for the 17-50 non-VC and VC also (just to understand your remark)and it looks a good alternate....
I never imagine anything else than a canon EF... I need to read more on the Tamron.
It looks that it is matching the result got with a prime, like the 70-200 F4Lis.. did it?
Anyway, Thank you for your approach... Really constructive!
If your priority is an as fast as possible lens, than I guess I know which one you will get. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> My last hopeless attempt to talk you into a 'slow' zoom <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />:Did you consider the Tamron 17-50/2.8 definitely non-VC?
[/quote]
Well, in the eventuality of a zoom, I was originally interested by the Canon 17-40L which is a bit above my budget and "only" F4.0
When I was younger, I was a Nikonian and really happy with my Tamron 90mm mounted on my FA. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> I just check the test on PZ (of course <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />) for the 17-50 non-VC and VC also (just to understand your remark)and it looks a good alternate....I never imagine anything else than a canon EF... I need to read more on the Tamron.
It looks that it is matching the result got with a prime, like the 70-200 F4Lis.. did it?
Anyway, Thank you for your approach... Really constructive!