Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Tamron 18-270 for Sony - is lack of IS a disadvantage?
#5
I agree that overall the Sigma seems like a better choice, but having had compatibility issues with Sigma lenses in the past I'm not crazy about them. I much prefer Tamron and Tokina.



The IS is a potential deal-maker/deal-breaker. I don't have any stabilized lenses, but if the long-term reliability and higher tendency to de-centering are real issues then count me out. If these aren't real issues, then for sure I'd be happy to be able to decide which IS to use.
  


Messages In This Thread
Tamron 18-270 for Sony - is lack of IS a disadvantage? - by boren - 05-02-2011, 06:02 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)