04-27-2011, 05:09 AM
> 50mm f 2 Hexanon-M or Voigtlander Heliar Classic 50mm F2
The Heliar is a little over-hyped regarding its capabilities it seems.
[/quote]
...the 50 mm f2 classic Heliar is a little overrated, but still good or it is actually nothing special?...
PS: thank you so much for all the advices <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> ...one last thing, I have been offered to buy the voigtlander 40mm 1.4 for a good price 250 euro and I was wondering which were the differences between this and the 35mm...they seems pretty the same to me, especially on the NEX, am I wrong? ( I have just read about some complaining on the bokeh of this objective <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> )
The Heliar is a little over-hyped regarding its capabilities it seems.
[/quote]
...the 50 mm f2 classic Heliar is a little overrated, but still good or it is actually nothing special?...
PS: thank you so much for all the advices <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> ...one last thing, I have been offered to buy the voigtlander 40mm 1.4 for a good price 250 euro and I was wondering which were the differences between this and the 35mm...they seems pretty the same to me, especially on the NEX, am I wrong? ( I have just read about some complaining on the bokeh of this objective <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> )