03-31-2011, 10:16 PM
Highly impressive![url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2"]http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2[/url]
next PZ lens test report: Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5 L II
|
03-31-2011, 10:16 PM
Highly impressive![url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2"]http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2[/url]
04-01-2011, 12:59 AM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1301609770' post='7261']
Highly impressive![url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2"]http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2[/url] [/quote] As we all knew, it's a great lens. The review would have also benefited from comment on how the lens compares to the TS-E 17, in terms of subject isolation, yes? GTW
04-01-2011, 05:09 AM
[quote name='genotypewriter' timestamp='1301619593' post='7267']
As we all knew, it's a great lens. The review would have also benefited from comment on how the lens compares to the TS-E 17, in terms of subject isolation, yes? GTW [/quote] Why should we compare a 17mm vs 24mm lens in this respect ? Apples 'n Oranges - at least from my perspective.
04-01-2011, 06:43 AM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1301609770' post='7261']
Highly impressive![url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2"]http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2[/url] [/quote] I think the figure legend for the tilt images should read horizontal and vertical tilt, not shift... right?
04-01-2011, 08:00 AM
[quote name='BG_Home' timestamp='1301640180' post='7274']
I think the figure legend for the tilt images should read horizontal and vertical tilt, not shift... right? [/quote] Right. Fixed. -- Markus
Editor
opticallimits.com
04-01-2011, 11:33 PM
My next lens! Just three more months to wait.
Must... Be... Patient... Must... Be... Patient... Must... Be... Patient...
04-02-2011, 10:46 AM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1301609770' post='7261']
Highly impressive![url="http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2"]http://www.opticallimits.com/canon_eos_ff/603-canon24f35tse2[/url] [/quote] Now, just make me a wide angle for APS-C that tilts and shifts! 35mm isn't wide enough <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
04-02-2011, 11:50 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-02-2011, 11:54 AM by Brightcolours.)
[quote name='Alexander ' timestamp='1301741177' post='7319']
Now, just make me a wide angle for APS-C that tilts and shifts! 35mm isn't wide enough <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> [/quote] They did <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> TS-E 17mm f4 L 17mm x 1.6 (Canon mount, so Canon APS-C crop factor) = 27.2mm <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> Not made for APS-C, which is neat though, because it then can perform a double roll (27mm on APS-C and 17mm on FF 135 format).
04-02-2011, 12:00 PM
If only the MFT id**ts would design such specialty lenses <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
04-02-2011, 03:10 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1301745001' post='7320']
They did <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> TS-E 17mm f4 L 17mm x 1.6 (Canon mount, so Canon APS-C crop factor) = 27.2mm <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> Not made for APS-C, which is neat though, because it then can perform a double roll (27mm on APS-C and 17mm on FF 135 format). [/quote] I forgot to write that I use Pentax <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |