02-25-2011, 06:43 AM
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1298583378' post='6339']
Same procedure, but different software. ACR, to my knowledge.
-- Markus
[/quote]
I've made a small test to check, if the Raw Developer shows more CAs on the same file, than the ACR
And see no significant difference to speak of.
So, if we have the same lens, same shooting distance, same testchart, (also same lightning, I hope?) and same Imatest version, it is unlikely to find twice as much CAs between these 2 different RAW converters (as we see sometimes in the tests of ZF lenses). So, if the conditions are the same between your shots and Klaus', it really could be a sort of sensor difference.
If they are not the same... I think there should be some more unity in the measurements <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />)))
Same procedure, but different software. ACR, to my knowledge.
-- Markus
[/quote]
I've made a small test to check, if the Raw Developer shows more CAs on the same file, than the ACR
And see no significant difference to speak of.
So, if we have the same lens, same shooting distance, same testchart, (also same lightning, I hope?) and same Imatest version, it is unlikely to find twice as much CAs between these 2 different RAW converters (as we see sometimes in the tests of ZF lenses). So, if the conditions are the same between your shots and Klaus', it really could be a sort of sensor difference.
If they are not the same... I think there should be some more unity in the measurements <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />)))