[Guest]

[quote name='miro' timestamp='1297760271' post='6123']

What happen here?

As usual the two canon evangelist GTW and BC hijacked the main subject.

Come on people! Be respectful for the opposite side!



I’ll try to explain my vision. Please correct me if I’m wrong.



Marcus expains why he moved to Nikon camp. -> The reaction was that 40D was even better camera. Sorry but such comparison it looks like “bus vs. car”. They are two completely different cameras. And they target two different groups of people.



Later on Borisbg provoke the tread in the next “indulgency”. Do you really believe in advertisements? If Michael Schumacher won F1 with red Ferrari does it mean that if I buy red Ferrari I’ll be the best driver on the road? Poor Lamborghini and McLaren drivers. I’ll the best!!!





I hope that my message doesn’t bring additional firefighting.





With Kind Regards,

Miro



PS. I’m canon shooter. I’m very happy with my canon 400d and 50d.

[/quote]

Nooo, do you really think they would want to convert as many people from nikon to canon? Such impartial and unbiased photographers? No, it really can't be <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ohmy.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':o' />



Anyway, it looks more like a knee-jerk reaction to anything related to nikon. Like, someone is looking for a long (105+) macro for FF nikon, genotypewriter can't help it: "since the 65mm MP-E is not on nikon", Markus enjoying the 200mm f/2 VR, genotypewriter: "Canon 200 f/2L IS is lighter, better, has a killer IS, etc", then 24mm 1.4, another about Canon's 200-400mm Extender 1.4x, etc, etc. Nothing's new here either <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':lol:' />