04-06-2017, 10:28 AM
https://www.zeiss.co.uk/camera-lenses/ph...28135.html
So 1999$ ... OMG.
It's featuring a Zeiss-native IS.
So 1999$ ... OMG.
It's featuring a Zeiss-native IS.
|
04-06-2017, 10:28 AM
https://www.zeiss.co.uk/camera-lenses/ph...28135.html
So 1999$ ... OMG. It's featuring a Zeiss-native IS.
04-06-2017, 10:43 AM
You mean, a Cosina developed IS?
![]() I love it. Not long ago the marketing blurb about manual focus, not to speak of IS, and why Zeiss has to go this way to deliver "highest quality". I always suspected that to be a cheap excuse not to go into R+D for doing a high quality AF. Asking premium prices for lowmium technology... I wonder, how long the Zeiss reputation keeps people paying more for less.
04-06-2017, 10:51 AM
They say it's APO ... whatever this may mean in Zeiss land (regarding bokeh fringing).
04-06-2017, 11:44 AM
Do they really say it is APO?
So far they say, it is APO-Sonnar design, this makes sometimes a difference, these specific wordings. I quote myself biut maybe these wording differences are merely academic.
04-06-2017, 12:31 PM
Quote:You mean, a Cosina developed IS?In the Zeiss land, even cheap excuses are not cheap. ![]()
04-06-2017, 01:07 PM
Quote:In the Zeiss land, even cheap excuses are not cheap. Yeah....cheap excuses are BS.......expensive ones are fraud! B) $2,000 Hmmm...... APO but only F2.8 surely at that price it should be an F2! Sigma 150mm F2.8 APO shallower DOF....... shallower DOP ........(depth of pocket) and it's a macro! No this Zeiss is the new way of re-hiking the price of lenses, and F2.8 is too small an aperture for a top flight portrait lens. Then there is the newly announced Sigma 135mm F1.8 coming soon.
04-06-2017, 09:00 PM
We're all loosers here.
Meyer Görlitz just came up with a Primagon, 24/2.8 (heck what a fasssst glasss) for Fuji X. So we soon can get the first APS-C glass for 5500 $. My goodness, why do they bother me with this cheap chunk? "And suddenly the GFX50S looks like a bargain" said Patrick, the hardcore Fuji fan. :lol: Sorry guys, I need to get a bigger flamethrower, I burn my cash far too slow.
04-06-2017, 09:19 PM
I am wrong, BTW. The 85mm has also a Zeiss IS.
And the 135mm does not correct bokeh fringing. I've spotted an image with green halos in the background.
04-07-2017, 05:33 AM
Quote:I am wrong, BTW. The 85mm has also a Zeiss IS. The girly marriage shot.....the wall behind looks to green fringe a little.... If it's not the image can you post the link? No in fact it's just the border is actually green! |