12-03-2010, 10:34 AM
[quote name='genotypewriter' timestamp='1291281485' post='4682']
Sure, it's good but "best" depends on what one needs to do. If it's a P&S that one needs, Nikon caters to that market ranging from the Dxxxx range to the Dx range. If one needs the maximum control because they know what they're doing, then raw shouldn't be cooked to anyone's liking because it can't be reversed/uncooked.
It's the same with most other areas too... for example there are such things as [url="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ns=p_PRICE_2%7C1&ci=8617&N=4294550597"]professional studio monitor speakers[/url] because they produce an output that's most linear/faithful to the recorded signal. They bring out all the ugly things recorded in a track too and so a sound-engineer can work on their piece/track as they choose to do. If you want something that just sounds nice you can go and get any of the other nice [url="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ns=p_PRICE_2%7C1&ipp=25&ci=2518&N=4294544049"]home entertainment speakers[/url] that add their own colour to the sound.
GTW
[/quote]
I don’t agree with your statement.
There is huge difference between sound listening and photography
By sound listening we are talking about Hi-Fi standard . The goal there is to reproduce the sound as close as possible to the real source.
While the photography is to photograph something that doesn’t exist or has not been seen on such way.
Journalistic/reportage photography, snapshots and photoequipment collection are dedicated sport branch.
Greetings,
Miro
Sure, it's good but "best" depends on what one needs to do. If it's a P&S that one needs, Nikon caters to that market ranging from the Dxxxx range to the Dx range. If one needs the maximum control because they know what they're doing, then raw shouldn't be cooked to anyone's liking because it can't be reversed/uncooked.
It's the same with most other areas too... for example there are such things as [url="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ns=p_PRICE_2%7C1&ci=8617&N=4294550597"]professional studio monitor speakers[/url] because they produce an output that's most linear/faithful to the recorded signal. They bring out all the ugly things recorded in a track too and so a sound-engineer can work on their piece/track as they choose to do. If you want something that just sounds nice you can go and get any of the other nice [url="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ns=p_PRICE_2%7C1&ipp=25&ci=2518&N=4294544049"]home entertainment speakers[/url] that add their own colour to the sound.
GTW
[/quote]
I don’t agree with your statement.
There is huge difference between sound listening and photography
By sound listening we are talking about Hi-Fi standard . The goal there is to reproduce the sound as close as possible to the real source.
While the photography is to photograph something that doesn’t exist or has not been seen on such way.
Journalistic/reportage photography, snapshots and photoequipment collection are dedicated sport branch.
Greetings,
Miro