Hail to the king ...
[url="http://www.opticallimits.com/sonyalphaff/554-zeissza85f14ff"]http://www.opticallimits.com/sonyalphaff/554-zeissza85f14ff[/url]
Very impressive results for such a fast lens me thinks.
Hum. Seems much better technically than the other 85's zeiss is producing. I wonder how it compares to the N 85 design wise. Bit perplexed by how zeiss chooses which design to use for which system. (the 50 for the N system is also a bit different than the other 50's they are producing).
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1285411171' post='3216']
Hail to the king ...
[url="http://www.opticallimits.com/sonyalphaff/554-zeissza85f14ff"]http://www.opticallimits.com/sonyalphaff/554-zeissza85f14ff[/url]
[/quote]
Thanks for the review <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
http://flickr.com/ephankim
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1285430234' post='3220']
Hum. Seems much better technically than the other 85's zeiss is producing. I wonder how it compares to the N 85 design wise. Bit perplexed by how zeiss chooses which design to use for which system. (the 50 for the N system is also a bit different than the other 50's they are producing).
[/quote]
Maybe N lenses are still under contract by Contax
http://flickr.com/ephankim
Optics look flawless but I don't think I could convince myself to spend that kind of $$$ for a lens without IF and SSM.
[quote name='Yakim' timestamp='1285526362' post='3263']
Optics look flawless but I don't think I could convince myself to spend that kind of $$$ for a lens without IF and SSM.
[/quote]
IF shoudln't be a deal breaker, IMO. Don't forget that IF essentially makes a prime a varifocal, or even a zoomlens (automatically, with focusing rather than exact control) <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />.
Kind regards, Wim <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....
Will you also retest the 24-70/2.8ZA in FF? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
http://flickr.com/ephankim
anyscreenamewilldo
Unregistered
for the example shots do you pop the pictures into acr and then, using adobe's standard settings only, the picture pops out - or you put a bit of effort into it?
