09-21-2010, 08:10 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1285094028' post='3066']
It is not obvious, as bokeh in other real life tests looks a bit better with the Canon, and the Canon border performance is better than that of the Nikon (according to the photozone data).
Also the Canon has about half the CA.
Both lenses are very good, and should basically be rated the same.
Here is a very informative test sample from a dpreview forums member, take a look for yourself.
[url="http://www.flickr.com/photos/genotypewriter/4698284415/sizes/o/in/photostream/"]http://www.flickr.co...in/photostream/[/url]
And don't start calling me a fan boy again, please.
[/quote]
Depends how you look at it. The Canon has non-existing corner resolution at f/1.4 but it is better at medium apertures.
Anyway, We're talking about a 3.2 vs 3.3 rating here. The ratings have simply a half stop fuzzyness but we'll not go into finer numbers - the amount of data does not permit a 100% scale neither here nor elsewhere.
It is not obvious, as bokeh in other real life tests looks a bit better with the Canon, and the Canon border performance is better than that of the Nikon (according to the photozone data).
Also the Canon has about half the CA.
Both lenses are very good, and should basically be rated the same.
Here is a very informative test sample from a dpreview forums member, take a look for yourself.
[url="http://www.flickr.com/photos/genotypewriter/4698284415/sizes/o/in/photostream/"]http://www.flickr.co...in/photostream/[/url]
And don't start calling me a fan boy again, please.
[/quote]
Depends how you look at it. The Canon has non-existing corner resolution at f/1.4 but it is better at medium apertures.
Anyway, We're talking about a 3.2 vs 3.3 rating here. The ratings have simply a half stop fuzzyness but we'll not go into finer numbers - the amount of data does not permit a 100% scale neither here nor elsewhere.