[url="http://www.opticallimits.com/sony-alpha-aps-c-lens-tests/545-zeisszm50f2nex"]http://www.opticallimits.com/sony-alpha-aps-c-lens-tests/545-zeisszm50f2nex[/url]
Very good (actually quite a bit better than on FT) and fun to use.
I was a bit agonizing whether to give it 3.5 or 4* but there's a 4* lens coming anyway. ;-)
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1283986769' post='2597']
[url="http://www.opticallimits.com/sony-alpha-aps-c-lens-tests/545-zeisszm50f2nex"]http://www.opticallimits.com/sony-alpha-aps-c-lens-tests/545-zeisszm50f2nex[/url]
[/quote]
Hi Klaus, on the second page in LoCA section page shows F1.4, F2, F2.8. Seems it's typo?
Thanks for the test.
[quote name='seevve' timestamp='1284012429' post='2598']
Hi Klaus, on the second page in LoCA section page shows F1.4, F2, F2.8. Seems it's typo?
Thanks for the test.
[/quote]
Yep, a copy & paste error ...
Thx!
Any thoughts to why it is so much better than on ft?
All in all looks like a decent enough lens, especially for the money.
[quote name='qadn' timestamp='1284029502' post='2602']
Any thoughts to why it is so much better than on ft?
All in all looks like a decent enough lens, especially for the money.
[/quote]
The pixel density is much higher on MFT.
Would like to see at least one good normalish (25/28/35)& wide (<=21)lens
Also if there would be many usable m-lenses - it would be really great to see 1-page review about nex-5 as manual lens camera, it coud be added to main camera review.
[quote name='Doroga' timestamp='1284043618' post='2612']
Would like to see at least one good normalish (25/28/35)& wide (<=21)lens
Also if there would be many usable m-lenses - it would be really great to see 1-page review about nex-5 as manual lens camera, it coud be added to main camera review.
[/quote]
We'll test a variety of lenses and I reckon we'll go for at least one 35mm lens. Not sure yet about 28mm.
Thanks for this "exotic" review.
Will you also test some Contax G lenses?
http://flickr.com/ephankim
