06-25-2010, 07:41 AM
[quote name='DavidBM' date='25 June 2010 - 09:30 AM' timestamp='1277451009' post='681']
Not sure I really get the rationale for your policy about final ratings for m4/3.
Presumably what you test is a system result: in other words it will be good for CA and distortion, but the price will be some corner resolution because of the interpolation. So if you give it a final rating on the basis of those distortion, ca and resolution figures, it'll be in some sense a fair comparison with other systems where the CA and distortion might be worse, but where the resolution won't be reduced.
[/quote]
Sorry, but the resolution figures are also affected albeit to a disadvantage of MFT.
Not sure I really get the rationale for your policy about final ratings for m4/3.
Presumably what you test is a system result: in other words it will be good for CA and distortion, but the price will be some corner resolution because of the interpolation. So if you give it a final rating on the basis of those distortion, ca and resolution figures, it'll be in some sense a fair comparison with other systems where the CA and distortion might be worse, but where the resolution won't be reduced.
[/quote]
Sorry, but the resolution figures are also affected albeit to a disadvantage of MFT.