[Rover]

I have one question.
Does the Mirrorless camera benefits from low flange distances in practice ? I want to stress the word in PRACTICE.
I knew from the past that Laica made great wide angle lenses.
I also know that in theory smal flange distannce give advantage in UWA lenses and almost no effect in tele range.
I also remembered how sony strugled to integrate UWA in NEX models.
What is the situation now?
thanks in advance

One word (alright, one word and two numbers): Sony 12-24.
Alright, the 16-35/4 they have is not too shabby as well, although probably not as good as the corresponding Canon - but it's noticeably smaller than that one too (-5mm filter size, -100 grams of weight).