Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
While we are at it - a new Samyang 24mm f/2.8 ...
#11
Sharpness is believable.
What I have a hard time believing is the distortion figures: I bet these are not native (raw) figures but corrected ones.
Also, I disagree with the quality of the bokeh. They find it nice and pleasing but I find it harsh and bad.
--Florent

Flickr gallery
#12
It's the sharpness charts that I have (more than) a little trouble believing in... same level of sharpness in the center and on the edges? In a decently fast wide angle near pancake lens on full frame? Yeah, and pigs can fly.

I would like to see what Klaus has to say about this lens - scientifically - but I'm not holding my breath, as usual. For all we know, we may be getting the next review (of any lens) by autumn at this pace.
#13
Which image shows harsh and bad bokeh?
  


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)