10-22-2018, 12:08 PM
*searchingmyspecs* oh yes. Hell, now that makes SUCH a difference 
Serioulsy, there's a bigger diff between the Nikkor and the Sigma. And I'm not even mentioning AF adjustments for close ups which both lenses would benefit from, but i'ts only possible with Sigma's dock.
Oh, and it might be worth to mention, there's already a version available for Sony (with "inbuilt" mount conversion tube), but here I think I'd prefer the rather small Sony genuine lens.
I also was trying to find out about the weight of the new Fujinon 8-16/2.8: 2k$, 805 grams, 12-24 eqiv.
Serioulsy, there's a bigger diff between the Nikkor and the Sigma. And I'm not even mentioning AF adjustments for close ups which both lenses would benefit from, but i'ts only possible with Sigma's dock.
Oh, and it might be worth to mention, there's already a version available for Sony (with "inbuilt" mount conversion tube), but here I think I'd prefer the rather small Sony genuine lens.
I also was trying to find out about the weight of the new Fujinon 8-16/2.8: 2k$, 805 grams, 12-24 eqiv.