|
OL rating system
|
Let's not forget that in some cases Klaus and Markus added a secondary "field quality" rating which was usually quite a bit (up to 2½٭) higher than the "technical" rating. It was usually reserved for fast primes that had some glaring deficiency when taken at face value. Sometimes there were even two such ratings added - one for landscape work and one for macro. Example:
http://opticallimits.com/nikon_ff/756-si...fx?start=2 |
| Messages In This Thread |
|
OL rating system - by thxbb12 - 10-22-2018, 02:27 PM
RE: OL rating system - by JJ_SO - 10-22-2018, 02:49 PM
RE: OL rating system - by thxbb12 - 10-22-2018, 03:57 PM
RE: OL rating system - by Rover - 10-22-2018, 04:06 PM
RE: OL rating system - by MatjazO - 10-22-2018, 06:07 PM
RE: OL rating system - by Klaus - 10-22-2018, 08:55 PM
RE: OL rating system - by davidmanze - 10-23-2018, 06:11 AM
RE: OL rating system - by JJ_SO - 10-23-2018, 08:00 AM
RE: OL rating system - by davidmanze - 10-23-2018, 08:25 AM
RE: OL rating system - by JJ_SO - 10-23-2018, 09:38 AM
RE: OL rating system - by davidmanze - 10-23-2018, 10:37 AM
RE: OL rating system - by JJ_SO - 10-23-2018, 12:03 PM
RE: OL rating system - by davidmanze - 10-23-2018, 04:34 PM
RE: OL rating system - by JJ_SO - 10-23-2018, 10:26 PM
RE: OL rating system - by davidmanze - 10-24-2018, 06:33 AM
RE: OL rating system - by Brightcolours - 10-25-2018, 06:36 AM
RE: OL rating system - by davidmanze - 10-25-2018, 08:00 AM
RE: OL rating system - by JJ_SO - 10-25-2018, 08:47 AM
RE: OL rating system - by Brightcolours - 10-25-2018, 11:06 AM
RE: OL rating system - by JJ_SO - 10-25-2018, 02:37 PM
RE: OL rating system - by thxbb12 - 10-25-2018, 05:33 PM
RE: OL rating system - by toni-a - 10-25-2018, 06:57 PM
|
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |
