01-09-2018, 09:55 AM
Maybe a replacement for the 16-50 now better fitted (and with sufficient image quality) for video?
I would rather prefer an XF-non-pancake version more akin to the 18-55 for still images - a wider, not too fast, variable aperture and not to big standard zoom with good or better image quality as most popular systems (alas Sony...) offer. IMHO that is still an omission in the Fujifilm lens line-up.
I would rather prefer an XF-non-pancake version more akin to the 18-55 for still images - a wider, not too fast, variable aperture and not to big standard zoom with good or better image quality as most popular systems (alas Sony...) offer. IMHO that is still an omission in the Fujifilm lens line-up.