05-09-2019, 06:20 AM
Well, it is hard to compare these images - the light is a bit different and the 85mm shot seems to be a bit darker than the 35mm one.
It's probably easier to spot in the full (RAW) image.
I suspect that you may refer to contrast here - some may prefer "micro-contrast" to express high-sharpness combined with comparatively low contrast.
Low contrast is typical for a "cheap" look.
Of course, comparing a 85mm f/1.8 - specifically the Sony FE - with a 35mm f/2.8 is also a bit unfair. It just doesn't get much better than a relatively moderate speed 85mm lens.
It's probably easier to spot in the full (RAW) image.
I suspect that you may refer to contrast here - some may prefer "micro-contrast" to express high-sharpness combined with comparatively low contrast.
Low contrast is typical for a "cheap" look.
Of course, comparing a 85mm f/1.8 - specifically the Sony FE - with a 35mm f/2.8 is also a bit unfair. It just doesn't get much better than a relatively moderate speed 85mm lens.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji