01-19-2017, 11:31 AM
There are a couple of differences. Not all make the X-T2 the better equipped choice, I envy the touchscreen already.
video makers will miss the energy capacity of 3 batteries (with grip), but benefit of the touchscreen, will miss log-D output and headphone socket.
Battery grip. some seals for weather resistance and bigger finder is another feature of X-T2 only. The not much useful front dial both cameras have. The boost mode for higher frame rates and EVF screen refresh is depending on the grip.
I miss customizable settings for the camera like very much advanced models have. But then, I don't know if I would go Fuji if I havd to decide freshly. Things are different today and seeing only the widely unsupported compressed RAW is enough to make me hesitate - which is also an excuse for me not to start to save money for GFX. I'm afraid, I will stick with Nikon for some while.
video makers will miss the energy capacity of 3 batteries (with grip), but benefit of the touchscreen, will miss log-D output and headphone socket.
Battery grip. some seals for weather resistance and bigger finder is another feature of X-T2 only. The not much useful front dial both cameras have. The boost mode for higher frame rates and EVF screen refresh is depending on the grip.
I miss customizable settings for the camera like very much advanced models have. But then, I don't know if I would go Fuji if I havd to decide freshly. Things are different today and seeing only the widely unsupported compressed RAW is enough to make me hesitate - which is also an excuse for me not to start to save money for GFX. I'm afraid, I will stick with Nikon for some while.