Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A (my) 8 euro contemporary-looking-to-modern-lenses 1988 lens.
Contemporary as in: Looks very contemporary to the current design of lens barrels.

This sunday I came across a Canon EOS 750 on a kind of car booth sale. The EOS 750 was one of the 1st EOS cameras, introduced in 1988. It was a simplified model, meant to only be used in auto-exposure (auto everything) mode. So, not a very desirable camera in any way, really. 

Mounted on it: a EF 35-70mm f3.5-4.5 A. The EF 35-70mm f3.5-4.5 (1987) was a typical standard zoom at the time, based on the manual focus standard zooms of the 1980s. 
In fact, it has the same optical formula as the Canon FDn 35-70mm f3.5-4.5 from 1983 and the autofocus AC 35-70mm f3.5-4.5 from 1985.
The EF 35-70mm f3.5-4.5 A is a "dumbed down" cheaper and lighter version of the EF 35-70mm f3.5-4.5, and probably was specifically designed with the EOS 750 in mind. No focus ring and no AF/Manual switch (autofocus only then).

This makes it look very contemporary with modern lenses... Just a smooth, straight barrel. 

.png   CanonEF3570mmf3545A.png (Size: 317.03 KB / Downloads: 8)
I decided to pay 8 euros for the camera and lens and see what it was about.

So, what is it about? A very light weight (230 grams) and small "standard zoom" with limited wide angle ability. It seems to be sharp enough at f8, and even usable wide open (albeit some PP sharpening might be wanted). Low in contrast to modern standard, especially wide open with backlight. Wide open very prone to purple fringing! Some CA issues are not a surprise, the bokeh seems to be surprisingly tolerable. Noisy and slow in AF. Appears to be pretty accurate (not really tested but that is the 1st impression).

One thing that I have noticed just now: at 70mm, even at f8 the corners are quite a bit darker than the rest of the frame.

.jpg   donnaingreenwater.jpg (Size: 496.18 KB / Downloads: 6)

This lens misses the rubber of the zoom ring so that needs some attention, but besides that it is in very good shape. Kinda fun to use this compact and small zoom from the beginning of AF. Equivalent to a 17.5-35mm f1.8-2.2 lens on MFT or 23-47mm f2.3-3 lens on APS-C.

I will have to use it more to get a better feel for what it can and especially can't do, but it appears to be a nice little, 8 euro, unassuming lens for unassuming tasks. More to follow. Oh yes, and on my 8 euro EF 35-70mm f3.5-4.5 A the rubber from the zoom ring is missing.
How could you skip the medium format equivalency. Your mission spreading the gospel isn't done unless you calculate and post these numbers. Big Grin
(06-21-2019, 09:33 PM)Rover Wrote: How could you skip the medium format equivalency. Your mission spreading the gospel isn't done unless you calculate and post these numbers. Big Grin

Which MF format in particular would you like to see covered?  Dodgy
Am I the one calling the shots now?
GFX/Hassy X1D, 6x4.5 and whichever else you see fit. Big Grin

Seriously, the lens looks interesting from the design standpoint, and I can totally see the allure of using old "junk" gear like this even when coupled with modern cameras. It's the same reason some people are enthusiastic about using adapted manual lenses, Lensbabies and whatnot. I feel that call sometimes, though I'm trying to avoid getting drawn into buying the gear that I might not be able to get rid of afterwards. Of course there's a thin line between "vintage" and outright bad gear, like the 75-300 zoom that Canon, in their infinite wisdom, chose to keep producing and marketing to unsuspecting casual APS-C shooters as a bundle that makes very little sense.

BTW I remember seeing (a few years back) a guy - apparently a tourist - with an 1DS Mark II and a vintage 35-70 Canon zoom, though probably not this one (most probably this: It made for a weird combo in my opinion but whatever floats his boat. Smile

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)