In the Sigma corner, I miss 105/1.4, 28/1.4 and if you want to ask again in the conclusion "what's the point of such a brick?" (I have no answer to that this time) as well the 40/1.4.
Or the 16/1.4 and 56/1.4 for Sony APS-C? Would be interesting how they compare to the excellent Fujinons.
Nikkor Z? I don't think you would add more information to what I already know about "high resolution, but poor distortion correction optically" and I haven't found a standpoint wether I like that or not, I think it all comes down to the question "distortion correction before light hits the sensor or afterwards?" and "you want light weight and small size? Then you have to be fine with software correction."
Fujinon 8-16?
I have no preference, my lens stock is overcrowded.
Or the 16/1.4 and 56/1.4 for Sony APS-C? Would be interesting how they compare to the excellent Fujinons.
Nikkor Z? I don't think you would add more information to what I already know about "high resolution, but poor distortion correction optically" and I haven't found a standpoint wether I like that or not, I think it all comes down to the question "distortion correction before light hits the sensor or afterwards?" and "you want light weight and small size? Then you have to be fine with software correction."
Fujinon 8-16?
I have no preference, my lens stock is overcrowded.