09-08-2019, 07:32 PM
(09-08-2019, 05:06 PM)Brightcolours
I did not "diss that lens" (nice rapper lingo there, dude), I just placed it in the correct perspective.
[/quote' Wrote: Dissing is not rapper lingo, as I mentioned once before. I lived and worked in the UK for 5 years, which is 20 years ago already, and it was a word in general use. So no need to call me dude either, which I do not particularly like being called.
[quote="Brightcolours" pid='47880' dateline='1562741596']
....
Besides that, the Olympus is a sharp lens of course, that is apparent. In FF terms, a sharp, slow 24-200mm f8 lens. A slow lens that weighs 239 grams less than the faster Canon 24-240mm f4-6.3 lens. A slow lens that is weather sealed, and $200 more expensive.
The last 3 lines of the above quote I was referring to.
The Canon is not a faster lens. It just has less DoF on a FF sensor that the Oly on an MFT sensor.
Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....