JJ, prior of uploading the image, it has no URL - thus I can't embed it (unless I go the extra mile).
As mentioned I'm using camerasize.com to create the comparison - they may or may not offer lens images with/without hood.
You seem to have more time to waste than me it seems.
I don't question the quality of the Sigma on DSLRs. I do question sloppy implementations - and (most of) these Sigma E mount lenses are just that - sloppy - resulting in unnecessary size.
Once Sigma will release native lenses the resale value of those workarounds will tank (see the resale value of Sony A-mount lenses). But then again, if money is no issue you don't need to bother.
For the rest of us, I will not recommend those lenses.
True - but camerasize.com doesn't list it yet.
As mentioned I'm using camerasize.com to create the comparison - they may or may not offer lens images with/without hood.
You seem to have more time to waste than me it seems.
I don't question the quality of the Sigma on DSLRs. I do question sloppy implementations - and (most of) these Sigma E mount lenses are just that - sloppy - resulting in unnecessary size.
Once Sigma will release native lenses the resale value of those workarounds will tank (see the resale value of Sony A-mount lenses). But then again, if money is no issue you don't need to bother.
For the rest of us, I will not recommend those lenses.
(07-21-2019, 11:28 AM)Rover Wrote: I think the third lens in this comparison should be the Samyang AF 85mm... they just released one for E mount.
True - but camerasize.com doesn't list it yet.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji