07-30-2019, 03:28 PM
True. It was really meant as a question, not as a statement "XX MP are enough!"
Questions are, when are we running out of structures and details fine enough to be recorded? In landscapes we often deal with haze and air pollution. And how dense can a sensor be without loosing the theoretical resolution to simple mechanical problems like shutter shock or shaky hands of the user? Some say theses limits are alredy reached with the 102 MP Fuji GFX 100 (same pixel density is in Fujifilm X-H1 and the new Sony α7 RIV - probably the sensor are cut of the same wafers). Sure, cropping is a nice thing - as long as lenses and AF accuracy are not the limiting factor.
Anyway, it's rumors - but there are also spec rumors which appear tobe more attractive than just getting more MP.
Questions are, when are we running out of structures and details fine enough to be recorded? In landscapes we often deal with haze and air pollution. And how dense can a sensor be without loosing the theoretical resolution to simple mechanical problems like shutter shock or shaky hands of the user? Some say theses limits are alredy reached with the 102 MP Fuji GFX 100 (same pixel density is in Fujifilm X-H1 and the new Sony α7 RIV - probably the sensor are cut of the same wafers). Sure, cropping is a nice thing - as long as lenses and AF accuracy are not the limiting factor.
Anyway, it's rumors - but there are also spec rumors which appear tobe more attractive than just getting more MP.