Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Canon RF 24-70mm f2.8 L IS USM and 15-35mm f2.8 L IS USM
Honestly, I have no idea how Nikon thinks to survive. If new lenses cut the benefit because of the R&D costs and they think they can reduce the loss by slowing the introduction of genuine glass, how do they want to convince Non-Nikon photographers to choose their Z-system?

15% loss in the first quarter?

Do they want to wait until the last Nikon-DLSR owner dies? Best I can say about the S-lenses: "they are sharp, light and comparatively small" - just to add "and expensive, relying on software correction, being super dull, with moderate speed (at best), very incomplete and with big gaps and at the same time double versions on the roadmap". Nikon sort of has to be happy, that Canon's bodies are not that well received by some reviewers, but I'm afraid, they close their eyes on what Canon already threw out of glass - and will continue to do so. It will remain interesting , but I don't have to remain a Nikon owner.

Messages In This Thread
RE: Canon RF 24-70mm f2.8 L IS USM and 15-35mm f2.8 L IS USM - by JJ_SO - 08-07-2019, 09:21 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)