01-15-2020, 09:50 AM
Klaus! Honestly, it was sheer coincidence that I referred to the miserable performance of the RF f/1.8 "macro". Look at the time stamps if you don't believe me!
I don't want to dwell on its shortcomings. I liked the first sample picture, of the lake! Probably, the need for close focusing and that wide an angle would have suggested a slower maximum aperture. I have the Olympus 30mm F/3.5 Macro for MFT. Even it struggles a bit.
I don't want to dwell on its shortcomings. I liked the first sample picture, of the lake! Probably, the need for close focusing and that wide an angle would have suggested a slower maximum aperture. I have the Olympus 30mm F/3.5 Macro for MFT. Even it struggles a bit.