02-13-2020, 09:48 PM
The "future" argument is fine but once again - how many people shoot video on the photo camera? 20%? I can't really imagine that it's more than that.
The thing is - the EOS R5 looks great but how much of the price that you are going to pay goes into the hardware enabling it to do 8K? And why are 80%(?) of the EOS R5 users "forced" to pay for this? Ok, because they got "no choice" (if you just want IBIS and the supposedly better sensor) but still. I reckon that the processing power required for 8K (over 4k) costs north of $500.
Well, maybe the rumored R6 will be just about that.
The thing is - the EOS R5 looks great but how much of the price that you are going to pay goes into the hardware enabling it to do 8K? And why are 80%(?) of the EOS R5 users "forced" to pay for this? Ok, because they got "no choice" (if you just want IBIS and the supposedly better sensor) but still. I reckon that the processing power required for 8K (over 4k) costs north of $500.
Well, maybe the rumored R6 will be just about that.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji