Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Wide Angle for X-T30
#11
(05-23-2020, 08:36 PM)thxbb12 Wrote:
(05-23-2020, 12:37 AM)Hapo Wrote:
(05-22-2020, 08:12 PM)thxbb12 Wrote: I have the opposite opinion.
If 18mm is not enough, it's likely that 16 won't be either.
Heck, even 14mm might not be enough either.
What I can say though, is that the 14mm is a very good lens optically. Very well corrected optically (almost no distortion) and very sharp across the frame.
Unless you value some DOF control at wide angle, I don't see the point of the 16mm...
Now, if you want the most versatile package (at the cost of some IQ), the 10-24 f4 might be your best option.

...I was wondering if anyone would mention that lens...

...I was originally concerned that @ f4 it was too slow but in a review I read some where it was noted that the image stabilization more than made up for that in low light situations...

...how much IQ is compromised IYHO...???...Klaus seemed to like his...maybe I should just ask myself, " What would Klaus do ? "...

...I just noticed there is no 8-16mm/f2.8 review...I did consider that lens but it is just too big and expensive and does not have IS...

Compared to the 14mm f2.8, the 10-24 won't be as good optically. Not as sharp. The 14mm is tack sharp at f4. Maybe I had a bad sample of the 10-24, I don't know... But I've never been fully satisfied by its sharpness and this is especially true toward the longer end of the zoom.
In fact, I've never been very impressed by any Fuji zoom I've tested.
The primes are a different story, I find them very good.

...thank you for your informed opinion...

...maybe I should be comparing the Fuji 14mm f2.8 to the Zeiss Touit 12mm f2.8...

...this passage is causing me some consternation :

A key question is, of course, how the Zeiss lens performs compared to its nearest rival - the Fujinon XF 14mm f/2.8 R. The Fuji lens is slightly sharper in the image corners at medium apertures but then it's also not quite as wide. These two extra millimeters can make quite a difference. To phrase it differently: the diagonal view angle the Zeiss lens reaches 99 degrees vs 89 degrees for the Fuji lens. Thus if you are after an even more dramatic perspective in your images, the Zeiss may be the more interesting choice.

...the Zeiss 12mm lens is also larger and to some extent more costly than the Fuji 14mm...

...either would be n improvement over the 18-55...
  


Messages In This Thread
Wide Angle for X-T30 - by Hapo - 05-22-2020, 04:07 PM
RE: Wide Angle Prime for X-T30 - by MatjazO - 05-22-2020, 06:07 PM
RE: Wide Angle Prime for X-T30 - by thxbb12 - 05-22-2020, 08:12 PM
RE: Wide Angle Prime for X-T30 - by Hapo - 05-23-2020, 12:37 AM
RE: Wide Angle for X-T30 - by thxbb12 - 05-23-2020, 08:36 PM
RE: Wide Angle for X-T30 - by Hapo - 05-23-2020, 10:54 PM
RE: Wide Angle for X-T30 - by thxbb12 - 05-23-2020, 11:55 PM
RE: Wide Angle Prime for X-T30 - by obican - 05-22-2020, 09:04 PM
RE: Wide Angle Prime for X-T30 - by thxbb12 - 05-22-2020, 10:36 PM
RE: Wide Angle for X-T30 - by Hapo - 05-23-2020, 01:42 PM
RE: Wide Angle for X-T30 - by Klaus - 05-23-2020, 11:05 AM
RE: Wide Angle for X-T30 - by Hapo - 05-23-2020, 12:38 PM
RE: Wide Angle for X-T30 - by Hapo - 05-24-2020, 01:08 AM
RE: Wide Angle for X-T30 - by Klaus - 05-24-2020, 07:01 AM
RE: Wide Angle for X-T30 - by Hapo - 05-24-2020, 03:58 PM
RE: Wide Angle for X-T30 - by Hapo - 05-24-2020, 11:17 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)