• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Wanna play?
#11
7, 8, 10 and 11 are a bit surprising indeed, but I was expecting something more surprising ;-)
--Florent

Flickr gallery
  Reply
#12
(10-01-2020, 12:32 PM)Klaus Wrote: ;-)

Ok, Ok

#1 Nikkor AF-S 24-120/4
#2 Nikkor AF-S 24-70/2.8
#3 Nikkor AF-S 50/1.8
#4 Canon EF 24-70/2.8 II
#5 Nikkor AF-S 85/1.8
#6 Canon FE 24-105/4 IS
#7 Sigma 17-50/2.8
#8 Fujinon 18-55/2.8-4
#9 Nikkor AF-S 16-35/4
#10 Tamron 24-70/2.8 VC

Honorable mention:
#11 Samyang 14/2.8 (MF)

Some surprising items there I'd say.

Quite logic, standard zooms leading what is surprising a little bit is Nikon lead
  Reply
#13
(10-01-2020, 02:03 PM)thxbb12 Wrote: 7, 8, 10 and 11 are a bit surprising indeed, but I was expecting something more surprising ;-)

#11 is the most surprising.

* best RF lens review: 24-105/4 L IS at 130.000
* best MFT: Olympus 12-40/2.8 at 500.000 (Panasonic 20/1.7: 490.000)
* best Sony FE: Sony 70-200/4 at 290.000
* best Sony E: Sony 16-50/3.5-5.6 at 500.000
* best Canon EF-M: Canon 22/2 at 160.000
* best Laowa: 12/2.8 at 140.000
* best Tokina: 11-16/2.8 at 430.000
* best Sigma: 17-50/2.8 at 810.000
* best Tamron: 24-70/2.8 VC at 760.000
* best Canon EF: 24-70/2.8 II at 840.000
* best Canon EF-S: 15-85/3.5-5.6 at 740.000
* best Nikkor AF-S: 24-120/4 at 1.004.000
* best Nikkor DX: 16-85/3.5-5.6 at 560.000
* best Nikkor 1: 10/2.8 at 220.000
* best Pentax K: 18-135 at 310.000
* best Pentax Q: 8.5/1.8 at 110.000
* best Samsung: 30/2 at 220.000
* best Samyang: 14/2.8 at 750.000
* best Leica: 25/1.4 (MFT) at 460.000
* best Zeiss: 24-70/4 (FE) at 430.000
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com

Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
  Reply
#14
7 standard zooms out of 10... guess it's pretty unsurprising. The two primes are also very popular. The only really surprising item is the Nikon 16-35/4, but I guess since it was the originator of a whole class of lenses it may be explained.

Actually Samyang 14mm MF was a hugely popular lens so it's not surprising that it is somewhere near the top of the list - more surprising is that it did not make it into top 10. Even a few pros I know (including the local Reuters and AP photogs) have been using these things, though they are MF only.
  Reply
#15
I, for one, am a little surprised about the relatively moderate Sony FE numbers to be honest.
However, some readers have described us as "Sony haters' ... which is, of course, far from the truth.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com

Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
  Reply
#16
(10-01-2020, 11:27 PM)Klaus Wrote:
(10-01-2020, 02:03 PM)thxbb12 Wrote: 7, 8, 10 and 11 are a bit surprising indeed, but I was expecting something more surprising ;-)

#11 is the most surprising.

* best RF lens review: 24-105/4 L IS at 130.000
* best MFT: Olympus 12-40/2.8 at 500.000 (Panasonic 20/1.7: 490.000)
* best Sony FE: Sony 70-200/4 at 290.000
* best Sony E: Sony 16-50/3.5-5.6 at 500.000
* best Canon EF-M: Canon 22/2 at 160.000
* best Laowa: 12/2.8 at 140.000
* best Tokina: 11-16/2.8 at 430.000
* best Sigma: 17-50/2.8 at 810.000
* best Tamron: 24-70/2.8 VC at 760.000
* best Canon EF: 24-70/2.8 II at 840.000
* best Canon EF-S: 15-85/3.5-5.6 at 740.000
* best Nikkor AF-S: 24-120/4 at 1.004.000
* best Nikkor DX: 16-85/3.5-5.6 at 560.000
* best Nikkor 1: 10/2.8 at 220.000
* best Pentax K: 18-135 at 310.000
* best Pentax Q: 8.5/1.8 at 110.000
* best Samsung: 30/2 at 220.000
* best Samyang: 14/2.8 at 750.000
* best Leica: 25/1.4 (MFT) at 460.000
* best Zeiss: 24-70/4 (FE) at 430.000

What are the best 2 Fujis and their numbers? (the first is the 18-55, but which one is next?)
Thanks.
--Florent

Flickr gallery
  Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)