03-01-2021, 08:19 PM
I think the primary problem with eye-detect AF in DSLRs is that you have to double the sensor essentially. If you can't use the primary sensor, you have to implement one in the viewfinder (in place of the classic AF sensor) - or you follow Sony's SLT concept. The Sony SLT 99 II has eye-detect AF for instance - thus Pentax won't be first anyway.
About the high-ISO claim - at the end of the day, it is about the ability to capture photons. I suppose you can still do some magic but there are natural limits. A bigger area can capture more photons - that's just physics. If Pentax has improved the sensor by whatever means, the same concept could be applied to a FF sensor again.
About the high-ISO claim - at the end of the day, it is about the ability to capture photons. I suppose you can still do some magic but there are natural limits. A bigger area can capture more photons - that's just physics. If Pentax has improved the sensor by whatever means, the same concept could be applied to a FF sensor again.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji