Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
My review of the Tamron 20mm F/2.8 Di III RXD 1:2
#13
"In the field": right, thanks: fixed.

For what concerns extension tubes and the 14mm, I recall that some time ago I quickly tried my shortest extension tube (10mm) with the Samyang 12mm and no way. With wide angle lenses I fear that the required extension is by far smaller than what can be achieved with a tube. That's why when I first experimented with the fish-eye I had to use a thin shim made of cardboard, inserted between the lens mount and the lens body.
stoppingdown.net

 

Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2 
Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
  


Messages In This Thread
RE: My review of the Tamron 20mm F/2.8 Di III RXD 1:2 - by davidmanze - 03-10-2021, 06:41 AM
RE: My review of the Tamron 20mm F/2.8 Di III RXD 1:2 - by davidmanze - 03-10-2021, 08:07 AM
RE: My review of the Tamron 20mm F/2.8 Di III RXD 1:2 - by davidmanze - 03-10-2021, 03:30 PM
RE: My review of the Tamron 20mm F/2.8 Di III RXD 1:2 - by davidmanze - 03-10-2021, 07:07 PM
RE: My review of the Tamron 20mm F/2.8 Di III RXD 1:2 - by davidmanze - 03-10-2021, 08:54 PM
RE: My review of the Tamron 20mm F/2.8 Di III RXD 1:2 - by stoppingdown - 03-10-2021, 09:20 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)