Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Canon mirror (catadioptric) lenses for mirrorless RF?
#5
Indeed, 500mm for FF with a 13cm long lens in your bag. A 500mm f4 lens is cool and awesome to shoot sports with, but at 3 kilos or more, and a lot of bulk, you don't put that in your bag all the time. And the price...

So, why mirrorlens? Price. Size. Weight. Portability and affordability. For silly stuff like this:

[Image: DE700FE969444BFDA4130A61E1F85880.jpg]
[Image: D2A0DAF7D87C41E5B2D32D7DF6774170.jpg]
[Image: C425977993DA4CBF831C128353DB0F2C.jpg]
[Image: 3005395214C04F5E85A0C0CE5346CF5B.jpg]
[Image: E2049A6F4B5A4267B6F4D1F3DF776209.jpg]
[Image: 64D7CD66F1DA4D44AC36EACA9DF2B1DE.jpg]
[Image: 25E81C38D5B444CE9FFC05A1FD1A399C.jpg]
  


Messages In This Thread
RE: Canon mirror (catadioptric) lenses for mirrorless RF? - by davidmanze - 05-15-2021, 06:42 AM
RE: Canon mirror (catadioptric) lenses for mirrorless RF? - by Brightcolours - 05-15-2021, 01:15 PM
RE: Canon mirror (catadioptric) lenses for mirrorless RF? - by davidmanze - 05-16-2021, 07:39 AM
RE: Canon mirror (catadioptric) lenses for mirrorless RF? - by davidmanze - 05-17-2021, 07:19 AM
RE: Canon mirror (catadioptric) lenses for mirrorless RF? - by davidmanze - 06-14-2021, 10:55 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)