01-05-2018, 07:08 AM
|
01-05-2018, 11:11 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-05-2018, 11:11 AM by stoppingdown.)
I wonder how it compares, IQ-wise, to the SEL1670Z in the sub-range 18-70mm...
stoppingdown.net
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2 Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
01-05-2018, 11:34 AM
(This post was last modified: 01-05-2018, 11:34 AM by stoppingdown.)
Klaus, may I point out that your signature says "Chief Editor photozone.de"?
stoppingdown.net
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2 Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
01-06-2018, 11:43 AM
Come on, it'll always be the Photozone in our hearts.
![]() Speaking of the lens, it's an unexpected one but probably a goodie.
01-16-2018, 12:58 PM
First hands-on review, but no detailed sharpness analysis:
https://www.cameralabs.com/sony-e-18-135...-6-review/
stoppingdown.net
Sony a6300, Sony a6000, Sony NEX-6, Sony E 10-18mm F4 OSS, Sony Zeiss Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS, Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS, Sigma 150-600mm Æ’/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary, Samyang 12mm Æ’/2, Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN | A, Meyer Gorlitz Trioplan 100mm Æ’/2.8, Samyang 8mm Æ’/3.5 fish-eye II | Zenit Helios 44-2 58mm Æ’/2 Plus some legacy Nikkor lenses.
08-01-2018, 05:50 AM
Hi Klaus,
When will you review this? Thanks,
08-01-2018, 09:56 AM
Without Sony driving the APS-C market with more cameras and lenses, I don't see a review in the immediate future.
Canon EOS APS-C is another land deserted by the manufacturer for instance.
08-01-2018, 12:28 PM
(08-01-2018, 09:56 AM)forum Wrote: Without Sony driving the APS-C market with more cameras and lenses, I don't see a review in the immediate future. Canon APS-C is actually very well covered, the only thing it might lack is a fast OEM ultrawide, Tokina and Sigma fill the gap nicely, few new lenses that's IMHO because the line is practically full now
08-01-2018, 03:33 PM
(08-01-2018, 12:28 PM)Ťtoni-a Wrote:Well, that very much depends on what one expects. For someone like slowish zooms shooter, true. For advanced user, a lot is missing, like:(08-01-2018, 09:56 AM)forum Wrote: Without Sony driving the APS-C market with more cameras and lenses, I don't see a review in the immediate future. Fastish wide angle prime, like 15/2 or faster Tele prime, like 60/1.4 (1.8) Midrange tele zoom workhorse, like 45-150/2.8(4) and more... Some might claim gaps are covered by 35mm lenses, like 50/1,4 or 70-200/4. For others too much of a compromise. Simply, Canikon wants serious users to go to 35 mm sensor where can get more revenue.
08-01-2018, 06:06 PM
Back to subject, do you think 18-135 should be better than 18-105 ???
I am looking for an alternative for the 16-50 whose only advantage is size, I am leaning towards 18-105, unless the other one is really good |
Users browsing this thread: